Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Today I learn, today I question. (Flipped classroom)

  Last week, Sakirah was presented her topic about flipped classroom. She explained the flipped concept very clearly, thanks for her explanation. Last two weeks, before the presentation of Dee, when I, Te and Yee Hui were searching some materials in the library, we saw Shakirah and Dee were seriously preparing their presentation. Last week we met Shakirah again , she alone working so hard from morning until night sitting in the UM library, still ‘ flipped’ with her topic. Oh, so pity with her. But after her Saturday presentation, I can make a conclusion that she actually put efforts to doing well in her presentation. There is new and old concept to us to learn ‘flipped classroom’. Why I said ‘new’, because I really don’t know we can ‘flipped’ like that in our classroom. I said ‘old’, is because we actually have done it in traditional way or offline teaching and learning process in our classroom before.

         But indeed, there has been a lot of interest and controversy about the flipped classroom. Most people are currently defining the flipped classroom as a class in which the teachers are watched at home and the class time is used to work on what used to be assigned as homework. The flipped class is not a narrow methodology, but rather a philosophy, which has many different applications and modifications.
         Is the flipped class the future of education? Does it have serious flaws? As we see it, there are several misconceptions, which contribute to the controversy.
Below is what I can found in the web, share with you all: 


  • Fear that the flipped class would lead to less engaged students who simply look at videos:
The finding is, the writer discovering that what actually happens is that student engagement and student-teacher interaction increases.
  • The flipped class will lead to huge classes with little engagement:
 This is what the writer said:                   
The thinking here is that you could have many more students in a class if the video was doing the direct instruction.  This would make education cheaper because you would be able to hire fewer teachers.  One thing I say whenever I share the story of the flip with people is that I talk to every kid in every class every day.  One of the hallmarks of how I have flipped my classes is this statement.  But, if I had class sizes which were too large, even this methodology will fail.  The key to the flipped class is actually not the videos, it is the freedom those videos give the teacher to have engaging class activities and interaction with their students.
  • The flipped class is just bad lecture on video:
       This is what the writer said:
 The assumption by some is that if ALL we do is move the lecture online, we are only using     technology for bad pedagogy. Their argument is that we need less lecture and more hands on, problem based, student generated, and inquiry learning. And I agree with these folks.  However, I see the flip as a stepping stone for teachers who have lectured for all of their career.  For them the idea of moving to an inquiry, problem based learning model would be very difficult.  But the idea of simply recording what they already do and then move that to outside of the class is not a huge step.
  • The flipped class hurts students who have limited access to technology:
      This is what the writer said:
 I am surprised at how often I continue to see this objection.  When Aaron and I started the flip in 2007 we had a number of students without both computers and access to high speed internet.  We HAD to solve this problem.  We simply took 4-6 videos  and burned them onto a DVD and handed the DVD’s out to students.  Some students who had a computer at home but not high speed internet brought in flash drives and took home the videos that way.  If you really want to see an example of how the flip is working with a school with low SES, watch this video of Greg Green’s school on the outskirts of Detroit


There was a lot of argument about applying flipped classroom after Shakirah’s presentation. But I still believe that the flip are a good concept, so it depend on how the teacher implemented it in their class.  Flipping the classroom gets the student to become more independent learners, if we implemented it well, it not only can, but can changes the lives of many students, helping students become better learners and preparing them for their futures.

            
           Although flipped classroom concept can help students to do better in the future, but many   teachers are still struggling to ‘flip’ or not ‘flip’ in their classroom. My question is, honestly, do we really  can ‘flip’ it in our classroom?

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

Today I learn, Today I question.



This week Dee presented about the variety of Pedagogical Strategies for Internet Teaching and Learning. She showed us a very function able social network-platform, Schoology. The function of this platform is nearly the same with Facebook, but after the explanation of Dee, we could see the different of handle the online learning. It is more useable because it worked just like a form teacher managing the class duty. This platform indeed very helpful for us, especially for the teachers whose use online learning as one of the part of their teaching.
Dee showed us the Pedagogical and strategies for Internet teaching and learning. She listed out some questions before we select one for our online course, we should consider the following:

a) Are the students in the course familiar with e-Learning?
b) Am I experienced in conducting interactive e-Learning?
c) What technologies are available for facilitating the course's activities?
d) Do the students have the technical skills to use these technologies effectively?
e) What exercises would help prepare students?
f) How much time do I want to use for the activity?
g) How much time do students set aside for participation in the course?
h) What learning objectives do I want to achieve through an exercise?
i) What other goals do I want to achieve?

     All these questions above actually we have to ask ourselves before started an online teaching and learning. To design an online learning is not as easier as we thought. Every single think we have to cover before planning and before started to ask students to sign in our e-learning platform. If all the questions from (a) until (i) we can answer them positively, then we are on our way to a success teaching and learning journey.

As a teacher, our mission is to educate pupils. As Mr. Wulf wrote in 2007, we are increasingly dependent on technology. We are of an era of human existence referred to as the Information Age; as such, we should be more concerned with whether individuals can use technology. We should also be concerned with they understand why we use technology and what we use it for. 
My question is, when we design an e-learning for our students, are we really know why we are doing this? And are the students know why we are doing this for their learning?

Thursday, November 10, 2011

Today I learn, Today I question.



        When I started to prepare the topic that I have to present last two week, I was so struggled because I found that there wasn’t much reference for me to use. Until last Wednesday when Madam Ng listed out some sample of ID model, than I realized that Merrill, IDDIE and some famous ID model are using by instructors to instruct students on e-learning. Thanks Madam Ng for giving the guideline for me. I changed my power point slides 3 times in order to give the correct information in my presentation. I also was struggling with the examples that I gave because I really don’t have the best examples to show in class. After finished preparing the power point, I just took some familiar sample that I used to use.

        When Madam Ng asked me about how to put IDDIE in our web based learning, I noticed that actually I forgot to explain about the relationship within IDDIE and the sample I gave. Luckily Yee Hui reminded me that we had the power point to show how IDDIE was applied in our last assignment. Thanks Yee Hui.

        There are a few common ID frameworks us can choose to fit in our web-based learning. The choice of ID model depends on our objective of the learning also. And it is very important before we start to design a web based-learning.

         After my presentation, Madam Ng gave us some time to fit some ‘dots’ in a mind map (Theories of Learning, TPACK, PLE, Model of Learning Engagement, Visual Aspects of Designing Web-Based Learning, ADDIE.  ). This activity can help us to know better all the theories we learned, and from the mind map, we can really understand how these aspects worked. The purpose of the activity is to see how we connect the flow of these aspects in creating an effective Internet teaching and learning experience for both instructor and the students.

         This activity reminded us how to put all the aspects into our activity 3 also. Now, in my mind, that was more clearer how to start a web based-learning intead of just design a simple but useless e-learning platform for students. Thanks again to Madam Ng. So I think we have to plan again and design again our activity for assignment three in order to put all the aspects inside the e-learning. 

   Teacher can only be an effective teacher if and only if the concept of lifelong learning is put into practice in the teaching profession.  As a teacher, we do not expect to use the same practice years after years. The world is changing and so is our students, therefore a teacher who teach only do not make a good teacher, it is what the teacher learn either from everyday teaching experience or by doing some changes, that contribute to a good teacher.  

        Nowadays teacher can not just keep quiet without changing their mindset, waiting for something to happen. Teachers have to move in frond, define the suitable way for their teaching and learning. They have to work together with students, and make changes from time to time.

        My question is, how many teachers are willing to change their teaching methods?